| |
FINANCING
THE NACALA CORRIDOR:
First Private Sector Integration of Port and Rail
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
[<<] PREVIOUS
PAGE 1
2
3 4
5
NEXT [>>]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SPEECH
DIRECTORY:
Background on RDC
Investment Parameters
Case Study: Financing the Nacala Corridor
Structural Trends in African Privatizations
Case Study: Financing Ferrovias Guatemala
Structural Trends in Central America
Conclusions
Nacala Corridor Inspection Trip
|
|
Structural
Trends in Central America
Comparing Central America with other parts of the world is very much
like Africa — a lot of small, disconnected railways that don’t
connect with each other and were never designed to connect with each
other.
But unlike Africa rail is almost so far down the list of priorities that
people don’t even think about it in regional initiatives, like Plan
Puebla-Panana which is integration of Central America with North
America. And the social problems in many respects are worse than some of
the things that you’ll find in this part of the world.
Is this a success story? In this particular case I think it is very much
a work in progress. I can tell you from the perspective of Guatemala
that having a barely functioning railroad is better than having an
abandoned railroad; and we are continuing to make progress commercially.
|
|
| |
Conclusions |
|
| |
So let’s look at the Nacala Corridor in context and draw some
conclusions. Table C shows how the Nacala
Corridor compares with some of our other businesses.
|
|
| |
Table
C
| |
Guatemala |
Nacala
Corridor |
Estonia |
|
Tons 2004 |
157,000 |
300,000
Rail |
42,000,000 |
|
Lines of Business |
Atlantic:
containers, steel, sugar
Pacific: ?
Electricity rights-of-way, etc.: ? |
Port
& Rail |
oil,
fertilizer, metals |
|
Purchase Price |
$0
+
10% of revenue |
$7
million +
$2 million/year +
5% of revenue |
$60
million for 66% |
|
Initial Financing |
RDC
Local Capital Markets |
SDCN
OPIC
CFM |
Strategic
Investors
Int'l Capital Markets
IFC |
|
|
| |
Estonia hauled 42 million tons but on the Nacala Corridor about 300,000
tons moved by rail. And yet the investment in the Nacala Corridor is
something like $10 million and in Estonia for a railway that moves
several quantum levels of traffic more is like 6 times as much. So there
is a disproportionate amount of financing required to make the Nacala
Corridor work.
This is the bad news.
The good news is that relative to an operation like Guatemala, the
Nacala Corridor is a relatively good deal. However, in our own defense
Guatemala has a lot businesses attached to it that we just don’t know
what they’re worth; for example, the ability to run electricity
rights-of-way, develop the undeveloped ports, etc.
And the purchase price was $0.
Our commitment was to put the railroad back into operation and
give 10% of the revenue, not the profit, revenue to the government. Each
is different but it is interesting to see how these deals contrast.
I
would like to make a comment about financing. In our experience the
multi-laterals have found it very easy to do business in Europe. For
example, part of our financing in Estonia came from IFC (see Table
C). Getting financing for developing countries is more difficult. In
fact, political correctness—things like squatter policies that
prevented us from getting financing in Guatemala—has caused needless
deaths.
|

Top
|
| |
|

|
|

|
| Photo
6 (Guatemala 2000) |
|
Photo
7 (Guatemala 2001) |
Photo
7
shows a container that fell off and hit a bus, killing 23 people. If
Ferrovias Guatemala had 25% of the container market, which is normal
market share in North America, then saving 25% of those 23 people means
that there would have been people alive if we would have been able to
get financing. In the meantime, we struggle more slowly.
|
|
| |
Nacala
Corridor Inspection Trip |
|
| |
Now
I would like to share with you a trip I took on the Nacala Corridor. As
a railway investor, the best way to see a railway is from the cab of a
locomotive. So in late February, early March 2005, I made the trip from
Nacala to the Rivi Rivi Bridge which is north of Nkaya.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Photo
8…In
the port of Nacala there is a lot of container traffic. At one point
there were 500 containers backed up as a result, among other things, of
the delay in the privatization and the stagnation effect of having a
plan that kept getting delayed. Photo
9…Note the track conditions at the Nacala Port. There is a
stone holding the switch point open. This is environment that we stepped
into in January 2005. Photo
10…We have to start somewhere, so we are rehabilitating the
tracks at the Nacala Station and we are gearing up to do a main line
track program.
|
|
| |
|

|

|

|
| Photo
11 |
Photo
12 |
Photo
13 |
|
|
| |
Photo
11…But
let’s take a ride on the Nacala Corridor. Here is how a big shot like
myself travels by train. This is a converted guard’s van that we
outfitted as a caboose with bunks, stove, etc. The man in the picture is
Johan Beneke, who was referred to us by Braam le Roux. Mr. Beneke has
brought some very important innovations to this operation. We’re
looking to keep trains moving by having double crews, and one of the
ways to accomplish this is by having a caboose operation. Photo
12…Inocencio Horacio is seeing me off for my ride from Nacala
to Malawi. Photo
13…Here is a picture that embodies the whole trip–note that
all of the windows are broken in the locomotive. What you don’t see is
that the door was also about to fall off. These locomotives are
basically junk that have been kept running for a long time with very
makeshift maintenance.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
[<<] PREVIOUS
PAGE 1
2
3 4
5
NEXT [>>]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Position
Papers Main Index | Top
of Page
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Company
Overview | RDC Management
Team | Operating Entities |
|
| |
News | Photo Gallery
| Contact Us |
|
| |
|
|
|
|