A PARADOX OF FINANCING:  
Privatization of Parastatals by Parastatals

 
   
   
      [<<] PREVIOUS     PAGE    1      2      3      4      5       NEXT [>>]  
         
  SPEECH DIRECTORY:

Background on RDC

USA
Argentina
Guatemala
Peru
Estonia
Malawi / Mozambique

Investment Parameters

The Case for Privatization in Africa

Case Study: Financing the Nacala Corridor

Structural Trends in African Privatizations

Conclusions

Q & A Session
 


Excerpt 1

“Four years after start-up, Comazar and Spoornet International are active in 17 African countries…Many railway operators are hobbled by lack of rolling stock, poor maintenance and weak management.  They are crying out for the kind of service offered by Comazar and Spoornet International, which has beaten off some of Europe’s best railway operators in winning railway concessions across Africa…” 
(Enterprise, December 2001)



Excerpt 2

“Angry Customers say Shape Up or We’ll hit the Road…

…Claims by Spoornet…that it could achieve greater efficiencies were “rubbish” and that its top management is “incompetent”
…These outbursts were triggered, in part, by a proposal by Spoornet to reduce its wagon fleet from 90,000 to around 60,000 because Spoornet executives believe greater operating efficiencies would more than compensate. This is despite Spoornet’s inability to handle the business on offer with its current wagon fleet.” 
(Financial Mail, 18 October 2002)


Excerpt 3

“Corporate SA is struggling with Spoornet’s poor service, lax management and soaring tariffs…a number of customers are calling for increased private-sector involvement…a move…ruled out two years ago when the current structure of Spoornet was introduced.”
(Financial Mail, 23 August 2002)

Conclusions (continued)

But let me tell you what does scare me. What scares me is reading about Spoornet’s activities around the continent and our ability to compete with the government railway of South Africa.  What you see here (
Excerpt 1) is an excerpt from a newspaper article from the end of Year 2001: “…they have beaten off some of Europe’s best railway operators.”  Well, that’s an insult — they also have beaten off some of America’s best railway operators in winning railway concessions across Africa.

But what I think is truly scary is this domestic perspective on what is going on in South Africa right now.  We have heard about how South Africa is active in rail privatizations around the continent and yet this is what is going on in South Africa (Excerpt 2).  Spoornet is doing a scrapping program that reduces its capacity to handle traffic in its own country to the point where its own customers are making these kinds of comments in the press. As a personal note, as somebody who has been traveling in southern Africa since the early 1980s, I think this is a tragedy that a national railway system could be brought to this.

But what is most important from the perspective of this conference is that privatization in South Africa has been ruled out, even as South Africa is participating in privatizations elsewhere around the continent. The text on the right (
Excerpt 3) basically states that while South Africa is aggressively pursuing privatizations outside of South Africa, it has been successful in resisting it within its own country.

This is not intended as an attack on Spoornet, but simply an outside perspective on what should make sense for both South Africa and Southern Africa, which is: adherence to market forces as opposed to political forces.  The reason I say that is because the lessons of history are quite clear; in the long run, market forces always win.  Always.

To conclude, we believe that competition from the public sector represents greater risk than floods, famines, giant spiders, etc.  I would encourage you to think back to my previous comment which was, “What are we looking for in terms of investment parameters?  We are looking for a serious government and rational competition.”  Well, this is not rational competition; we cannot compete with it.  But we will go anywhere in the world if we can compete on an economic basis.  Fortunately for RDC we have been able to do that in the case of the Nacala Corridor.  I am personally very proud to be associated with what is essentially the first direct investment in rail by a private company on the continent.

Thank you.
 

 
         
     

[<<] PREVIOUS     PAGE    1      2      3      4      5       NEXT [>>]

 
         
     

Position Papers Main Index     |     Top of Page

 
     

 

 
         
 

Company Overview   |   RDC Management Team   |   Operating Entities

 
 

News   |   Photo Gallery   |  Contact Us

 
     


 


© 2003 Railroad Development Corporation
All photographs are the property of RDC.  Unauthorized duplication is prohibited.