| |
FIRST
PRIVATIZATION OF A FORMER SOVIET RAILWAY:
Bringing International Experience and Best Practice to Estonia
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
[<<] PREVIOUS
PAGE 1
2
3 4
NEXT [>>]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SPEECH
DIRECTORY:
Background on RDC
RDC Businesses
USA
Argentina
Guatemala
Peru
Malawi / Mozambique
Estonia
Investment Parameters
Why Estonia chose to privatize
How Estonia was restructured
Results to date
Differences between
Former Soviet railways and other continents
Differences between Estonian Railways and Russian Railways
Estonian Railways' market position
Estonian Railways' strategy
Suggestions for Russia
Q & A Session
|
|
Differences
between Former Soviet railways and other continents
Let
me exercise some caution here and point out that there some fundamental
differences (Table A) between the Former Soviet
railways and even those of other continents. In particular, we’ve
heard a lot at this conference about how Russia compares with Germany
and other European countries. But I think it is important to consider
that the Russian Railways have more in common with North America than
with Europe.
The prime business of the Russian Railways is freight, just as in North
America; there are long distances in Russia, just like North America;
and so there are more similarities between North America and Russia than
there are between Europe and Russia.
Table A
| |
North
America |
Europe |
Former
Soviet |
| DISTANCES |
Long |
Short |
Long |
| TRAFFIC
PATTERNS |
Concentrated |
Fragmented |
Fragmented |
| COMPETITION |
Other
Rail |
Truck |
Other
Producers, Pipelines |
| CAPACITY
CONSTRAINTS |
Line
Capacity |
Clearances |
Line
Capacity |
| ORIENTATION |
Freight |
Passenger |
Freight |
|
|
| |
|
Differences
between Estonian Railways and Russian Railways
And in examining the differences between Estonian Railways and Russian
Railways, I think there are some extremely important differences (Table
B). For the most part, Russia is full of producers and Estonia is
basically a transit corridor for Russian products. Another way of
looking at it is: if you have a factory in the middle of Russia, you
have one railway to deal with; but in terms of how you get it out of the
country, you have many choices–send it to Russian ports, Estonian
ports, Latvian ports or Lithuanian ports.
|
|
| |
|
|
Table
B
| |
Estonia |
Russia |
| TRAFFIC
GENERATORS |
Ports |
Producers |
| COMPETITION |
Other
Ports |
Other
Producers |
| CAPACITY
CONSTRAINTS |
Borders |
Line
Capacity |
| TARIFF
REGULATION |
NO |
YES |
So
Estonian Railways is in an intensely competitive market and our strategy
has been to try to stay ahead of that competition by making the ports more
competitive, which we’ll discuss next.
|
|
| |
|
|
Estonian
Railways’ market position
Estonian Railways is heavily dependent on Russian traffic. We are
nothing more than the middle link between the Russian producers, the
Estonian ports and the ultimate market; and there are many ways for that
traffic to go. And we have very little ability to influence the physical
capacity of Russian Railways or the tariff policy of Russian Railways.
If you look at our tariffs and the percent of the haul that occurs in
Estonia, it is a very small piece of the cost of moving the traffic. We
have to work very hard, very smart and very fast in order to succeed in
this business.
|

Top
|
| |
|
|
Estonian
Railways’ strategy
Our
strategy is very simple — we are working with the Estonian ports to be
competitive as an outlet for Russian traffic; we have positioned
ourselves as a user-friendly gateway to and from the Russian market; and
we are proving, in conjunction with Estonian ports, that we can handle
different types of traffic under a variety of conditions. For example,
we are handling traffic such as grain, coal and oil, but we need to
diversify our traffic base much more and build the customer confidence
that this will require.
Most
importantly, we have to work very closely with Russian Railways. I took
this photo myself at Pechory in September 2003. We have a very good
working relationship with the October Railway and we hope to build from
there.
|
|
| |
|
|
Suggestions
for Russia
At this point let me be highly presumptuous and come up with some
suggestions for Russia, given that you are in a critical stage as far as
the future of the railways. The most important thing to remember is that
Russia’s environment is much different from that of North America and
Europe. For this reason and more, restructuring should be undertaken
very carefully. Most of the countries in which RDC does business
privatized their railways because they had nothing to lose, the classic
example being Argentina; there, the railways did not have a major role
in the economy, so if we screwed up it would not be a big problem. But
given the heavy dependence of Russia’s economy on the railways, this
is not something that should be done lightly, and this is not something
that should be done for political reasons to get done before the next
election, as was done in the United Kingdom. Another reason is that in
North America we have a highly developed road system, which is one of
the reasons we only handle 30 percent of the traffic; if the railways
failed in North America, it would not be as bad as if the railways
failed in Russia.
At this point in the year 2004, there are many countries that have gone
down this road—many countries that have privatized, many countries
that have restructured—and there are lots of models from which to pick
and choose. There are probably more failures than successes, but that is
what Russia gets to benefit from—that others have made mistakes and
paid for them.
My other advice is to focus on the Customer, which is how the North
American railways have evolved. What is left of the North American
railway system is a vigorous and privately financed system that exists
to do nothing other than serve our Customers.
Finally, I would like to extend a personal invitation to come to Estonia
and see for yourself how a Former Soviet Railway has been restructured,
and you can do so by taking the overnight private sector passenger train
from Moscow to Tallinn. We are very proud of what we have accomplished
and we want to have a closer relationship with Russia.
These are very exciting times for railways.
As somebody who in my younger days admired the Russian Railway
system for being the world’s biggest—handling at that time half of
the world’s rail traffic—Russia still has 25% of the world’s
railway traffic. I’m personally proud to be associated with a little
railway that is a gateway for Russia to the outside world, just as it
represents an opportunity to introduce new technology into this
environment.
Thank you.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
[<<] PREVIOUS
PAGE 1
2
3 4
NEXT [>>]
|
|
| |
|
|
Position
Papers Main Index
| Top of Page
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Company
Overview | RDC Management
Team | Operating Entities |
|
| |
News | Photo Gallery
| Contact Us |
|
| |
|
|
|
|